Algae’s Materials Moment: The Rulebook (What EU Policy Requires)

The algae materials space is buzzing with innovation, but what we don’t often see is that policy is moving just as fast. It’s a case of two truths coexisting: algae-based materials show extreme promise, while regulations are getting tougher for everyone.

The EU’s new Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR) entered into force on 11 February 2025, with general application set for mid-2026. It mandates that all packaging be recyclable by 2030, sets waste-reduction and reuse targets, and restricts problematic formats. This means that any algae-based solution hoping to scale must now play by a tighter, clearer, and more circular rulebook.

The PPWR sets ambitious, binding objectives and requirements:

  • All packaging must be recyclable by 2030.
  • Mandatory reuse and waste-reduction targets apply to various sectors.
  • Certain problematic formats will be restricted or banned outright.

A core consideration is that compostability no longer serves as a catch-all solution. Unless the Commission expands the list, compostability is limited to a narrow range of approved use cases, such as tea bags, coffee pods, fruit stickers, and lightweight plastic bags, and only where national bio-waste collection systems exist.

This means that most bioplastics, including algae-based ones, must either:

  • Be recyclable, or
  • Fit within the approved compostable categories with guaranteed collection.

Compostable materials that don’t meet these criteria risk becoming legally and commercially stranded.

The European Commission’s accompanying policy framework reinforces three key principles:

  • There is no single EU law governing all such plastics, multiple compliance layers apply.
  • Environmental claims must reflect actual end-of-life conditions.
  • Bioplastics should not distract from the main priorities: waste prevention, reuse, and recyclability.

In short, being “biodegradable” is no longer enough. If a material doesn’t degrade under real-world local conditions, the claim can be misleading and possibly illegal.

Standards remain important for compostable labelling. EN 13432 (EU) and ASTM D6400 (US) continue to define industrial compostability requirements. In some Member States, such as France, specific marks are required when compostable items are permitted.

However, under the PPWR, compostability is the exception, not the norm. Algae innovators should therefore prioritise recyclable designs (e.g. seaweed-based barriers on paper or board) or reusable systems.

To align with the PPWR, material developers need to account for a fundamental shift:

  • Design for recyclability first: Prioritise mono-material fibres and algae-based barriers compatible with standard recycling systems. Reserve compostable formats only for the few approved categories with guaranteed bio-waste collection.
  • Avoid greenwashing: As Yale E360’s critique highlights, “will just disappear” messaging can backfire, both legally and reputationally.
  • Certifications are useful but not sufficient: Even certified compostable materials can end up in landfills if the local infrastructure doesn’t exist.
  • Align early with municipalities and producer-responsibility schemes to ensure materials flow into real waste systems and meet EU obligations.

The PPWR doesn’t kill algae-based plastics; it focuses and aligns them with today’s environmental priorities. It demands clarity, circularity, and evidence behind every claim.

The winners in this new regulatory landscape will be those who integrate algae materials into recycling and reusable systems, or deploy them within controlled collection contexts that can prove real environmental gains across the full life cycle.


The article was written by Christopher Kennard (reframe.food), Project Communication Manager.

Sources:

  1. https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/waste-and-recycling/packaging-waste/packaging-packaging-waste-regulation_en
  2. https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/plastics/biobased-biodegradable-and-compostable-plastics_en
  3. https://www.dlapiper.com/en/insights/publications/2025/05/ppwr-how-does-it-fit-in-with-french-law-requirements
  4. https://docs.european-bioplastics.org/publications/bp/EUBP_BP_En_13432.pdf
  5. https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/waste-and-recycling/packaging-waste_en
  6. https://e360.yale.edu/features/why-bioplastics-will-not-solve-the-worlds-plastics-problem
  7. https://docs.european-bioplastics.org/publications/bp/EUBP_BP_En_13432.pdf

Facebook
Pinterest
Twitter
LinkedIn